MY CONVERSATION WITH CHATGPT IN REGARDS TO "Information overload and misinformation" (PART 4)

 

This channel test was actually more interesting rather than a theme topic per se. Once again it does show ChatGPT's limitations in discerning information that is correctly sourced and if it is asked something outside its knowledgeable spectrum, the AI tends to generalize its answers and some cases create a misinformed opinion. Thus, it can be steered to its correct responses, which might be a human programming glitch in its relaying of information.  As noted, when I asked if it knew a certain quote by the late French philosopher Jean Baudrillard.

___

I know you can't form opinions. But, what do you think of this quote?

"We live in a world where there is more and more information,

and less and less meaning.

“As an AI language model, I don't have personal opinions, but I can say

that the quote reflects a common sentiment about the abundance of

information in the digital age and the difficulty in finding what is

meaningful and relevant.”

Do you know who made that quote?

“The origin of the quote "We live in a world where there is more and

more information, and less and less meaning” is uncertain and there

is no widely accepted attribution. The sentiment expressed in the

quote is a common one, and similar statements have been made by

several authors, thinkers, and public figures.”

[I then wanted to see if I could steer the AI Chat to the correct

answer.  This would show its capacity to navigate from a users

input.  But, I would not call this artificial intelligence, more so that

it is capable of being lead in a certain direction with information that it receives.  Hence

the user is controlling that flow of information.]

Do you know the movie, "The Matrix"?

“Yes, "The Matrix" is a science fiction action film released in

1999. It was directed by the Wachowskis and stars Keanu Reeves,

Laurence Fishburne, Carrie-Anne Moss, and Hugo Weaving. The film

depicts a dystopian future in which humanity is trapped inside a

simulated reality created by sentient machines. The film is widely

known for its action sequences, special effects, and its exploration

of themes such as virtual reality, free will, and the nature of

reality.”

Do you know the scene where Neo, played by Keanu Reeves, lifts a book

from a shelf, in his apartment, at the start of the movie?

“Yes, I am familiar with that scene. It is a memorable moment from the

beginning of "The Matrix," where the main character, Neo,

played by Keanu Reeves, reaches for a book titled "Simulacra and

Simulation" by Jean Baudrillard, from a bookshelf in his

apartment. This scene is often interpreted as a visual representation

of the film's central theme, which is the idea that reality may not

be what it appears to be.”

[I was impressed by the above response, not so much of its detailed reply, but knowing that it would respond in such a way.  Now note how it is lead back to the original question at the start of the conversation.]

Correct. So the quote, "We live in a world where there is more and more

information, and less and less meaning,” actually comes from

"Simulacra and Simulation" by Jean Baudrillard.

“Yes, that's correct. "We live in a world where there is more and more

information, and less and less meaning," is a quote from Jean

Baudrillard's book "Simulacra and Simulation". In the book,

Baudrillard argues that in postmodern society, the distinction

between reality and representation has broken down, leading to a

hyperreality in which images and symbols replace authentic

experiences and relationships. The quote reflects this idea by

suggesting that the abundance of information in the modern world can

make it difficult to discern what is meaningful or authentic.”

[If, in my opinion, it was truly AI, it would not have been lead to the

answer by myself.  It should of known where that quote came from at

start of the conversation.  However, what is impressive to an extent,

is it companionship in responding to information hand in hand with a

human prompt.]

Below was the 2^nd test of its ability to discern and answer correctly.  As follows:]

Have you heard about AI able to search for intelligent life in the

Universe better than humans?

“Yes, I am aware that AI is being used to search for evidence of

intelligent life beyond our own planet. AI algorithms can be trained

to analyze large amounts of data from astronomical observations and

identify patterns that may be indicative of extraterrestrial

civilizations. These techniques have the potential to be more

efficient and effective than traditional methods used by astronomers,

as they can quickly sort through massive amounts of data and identify

relevant signals. However, it is important to note that the search for extraterrestrial life is

a challenging task, and there is still much we do not know about the

universe and the conditions that are necessary for life to exist. AI

can be a valuable tool in this effort, but it is not a replacement

for human expertise and interpretation. Ultimately, the discovery of

intelligent life beyond our planet will require a combination of

human and machine intelligence.”

But, humans can be rash with the information that they receive.  Even

trained astronomers.  Did you hear about the astronomers that thought

they had found an Alien signal; when it was in fact the microwave in

their shared kitchen.

“Yes, that is a well-known example of the challenges and limitations of

searching for extraterrestrial life. The incident you are referring

to is the "Wow! signal," which was detected in 1977 by the

Big Ear radio telescope at Ohio State University. At the time, some

astronomers thought that the signal might be evidence of

extraterrestrial life, but subsequent investigation showed that the

signal was probably caused by human-made interference, such as a

radar or satellite.”

No, it was not the 1977 "Wow!" signal. It was the Parkes radio

telescope based in NSW, Australia.  The incident occurred in 2010,

when Fast Radio Bursts kept showing up in a regular manner.  Which in

fact was the 'staff' microwave oven.

[The answer below was very human-centric, when it failed to see its error

and shifted the response to cover the wrong answer.]

“Thank you for correcting me. Yes, you're right, the incident I was thinking

of involved the Parkes radio telescope in Australia and not the "Wow!

signal" detected by the Big Ear radio telescope in Ohio. I

apologize for the mistake. Your point is well taken, and it

highlights the importance of double-checking and verifying any

signals that are detected in the search for extraterrestrial life,

and the need for careful analysis to rule out alternative

explanations.”

___

At least it apologized!